<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Affinitive's Social Media Playground &#187; sprint pcs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmediaplayground.com/tag/sprint-pcs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmediaplayground.com</link>
	<description>Welcome to Social Media Playground, a place to discuss all things related to word of mouth (WOM) and social media marketing. Brought to you by Affinitive, a word of mouth and social media marketing, technology and strategic solutions firm located in New York City and San Francisco.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:37:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Product Placement versus Consumer Engagement</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmediaplayground.com/social-media/product-placement-versus-consumer-engagement/2008/07/07/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=product-placement-versus-consumer-engagement</link>
		<comments>http://www.socialmediaplayground.com/social-media/product-placement-versus-consumer-engagement/2008/07/07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Affinitive</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product placement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint instinct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint pcs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word of mouth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmediaplayground.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea of “product placement” is one that many entertainment industry veterans are so familiar with, it is likely a part of their daily vocab. There are many memorable examples of product placement throughout the years, including the origin of the “Soap Opera” which comes from the show’s original sponsors, a list that included Proctor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.socialmediaplayground.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/sprint-instinct1.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-98" style="float: left; margin: 5px;" title="sprint-instinct1" src="http://www.socialmediaplayground.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/sprint-instinct1-300x188.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="188" /></a>The idea of  “product  placement” is one that many entertainment industry veterans are so familiar with,  it is likely a part of their daily vocab. There are many memorable examples of product placement throughout the years, including the origin of the “Soap  Opera” which <a title="blocked::http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soap_operas" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soap_operas">comes from the show’s original  sponsors</a>, a list that included Proctor &amp; Gamble and Colgate-Palmolive,  when it was a radio broadcast and the soap manufacturers were the sole sponsors.   Recent examples include, <a href="http://www.productplacement.biz/200805262313/News/Television/American-Idol-Product-Placement-Nielsen-Counts.html">Coca-Cola and Ford taking center stage on <em><span style="font-style: italic;">American Idol</span></em></a> and other blatant placements that have garnered the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/26/AR2008062603632.html">investigation of the FCC on how exactly to regulate them</a>. The most notable  example as of late comes from the placement of a wide assortment of brands and  products ranging from Glaceau’s Smart Water to Mercedes-Benz to the ever-present  Apple in <a title="blocked::http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2008/05/sex-and-the-cit.html" href="http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2008/05/sex-and-the-cit.html">a  product-heavy <em>Sex and the City</em> film</a>, a movie that  was SO filled with placements that hardcore SATC fans hit the blogosphere with  their Manolos pounding in disdain.</p>
<p>With media moving to more  non-traditional means, it was only a matter of time before the idea of the  product placement hit the web. Last month, <a title="blocked::http://www.instinctthephone.com/?id9=SEM" href="http://www.instinctthephone.com/?id9=SEM">Sprint PCS launched a consumer  promotion</a> on <a title="blocked::http://youtube.com/watch?v=Gfp1vRNo7Zk&amp;feature=related" href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=Gfp1vRNo7Zk&amp;feature=related">YouTube where  they ask you to make a family or summer video that features their new Sprint  Instinct phone, as a product placement</a>.  Shill their product in your home  vid and you will get $20 for your efforts. Their name of the promotion “Sell  Out” would indicate that perhaps this all is just some joke, meant to combat the  edge and wittiness of Apple’s marketing, owners of the iPhone, which this phone  was made to directly compete with.</p>
<p>The idea of this type of placement  has had mixed reactions across the board.  To me, there are several key  questions that have come up from the consumer and brand perspectives that leave  gaping holes in a promotion like this that could ultimately note bode well for  Sprint’s credibility within non-traditional online channels. A few of these  questions being: Is a measly $20 a strong enough value proposition? Will any  viewer of this video see it as a genuine endorsement? Is this just some  publicity stunt by agency <a title="blocked::http://www.goodbysilverstein.com/main_site/main.html" href="http://www.goodbysilverstein.com/main_site/main.html">Goodby, Silverstein  &amp; Partners</a> to try out the social media space and perhaps garner some  blogosphere buzz? And perhaps most importantly (and most unanswered) <em><span style="font-style: italic;">will this really</span></em> <em><span style="font-style: italic;">translate to any sales of the Instinct</span></em>?</p>
<p>With reference to the latter, only  time will tell, but as someone who prides themselves on working for a company  who builds Word-of-Mouth the genuine way, I feel as though the distinction  between a genuine brand reference within a social media channel and one of  placement must be made.  There is a vast and incomparable difference between  Word-of Mouth that is cultivated by simply giving your product to a consumer and  allowing them to experience it, engage with it, and then let you know how they  feel, the natural, raw, organic way that is based on opening up a dialog  versus these paid placement promotions that don’t come from any basis other than  people willing to shill if the price is right without any passion or affinity  towards the brand.</p>
<p>At Affinitive, we pride  ourselves on building programs that result in user generated content as a by  product of an engagement strategy, where consumers participate because they are  interested in learning about the product or because they already have a passion  for or relationship with the brand.  We could not have the quality or quantity  within our library of content for each program that we have by shelling out a  few twenties for some videos.</p>
<p>We love to reward consumers for their willingness  to engage and create content, but doing so in a way that is about the consumer  and not about the creation of a tool for the brand makes a world of  difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.socialmediaplayground.com/social-media/product-placement-versus-consumer-engagement/2008/07/07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>218</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

